CryptoQuant: US Entities Hold 65% More Bitcoin Than Offshore Counterparts at Record Levels as of Jan 9

Bitcoin reserves held by US-based entities have risen to outpace offshore holdings by a wide margin, underscoring a pronounced shift in how major stakeholders view and deploy Bitcoin within regulated, institutionally accessible frameworks. The latest data reveal that US entities now hold a substantially larger share of the market’s Bitcoin reserves, a trend that has continued to widen since fall 2024 and has coincided with a notable price rally for Bitcoin. As of early January, the gap between US-held reserves and offshore reserves stood at about 65%, marking a new pinnacle in the long-running divergence between domestic and offshore crypto holdings. This article dissects the drivers behind that asymmetry, the institutions responsible, the market implications for price and liquidity, and what this means for the broader crypto ecosystem going into 2025 and beyond.

Table of Contents

US-based Bitcoin reserves surpass offshore holdings: trends, definitions, and implications

The divergence in Bitcoin reserves between US-based institutions and offshore players is rooted in a mix of regulatory clarity, access to regulated investment vehicles, and a growing appetite among U.S. corporates and fund managers to hold Bitcoin as a treasury asset or strategic hedge. The metric used to quantify this disparity compares the Bitcoin holdings of known US entities—spanning corporate treasuries, publicly traded Bitcoin-focused vehicles such as spot ETFs, major exchanges, mining firms, and even the US government—to the holdings of known offshore counterparts. The metric has shown a clear upward trajectory over several months, reaching an all-time high by January 9 data revisions, with US-held reserves now 65% greater than offshore reserves.

To put this into perspective, the ratio of US to offshore Bitcoin holdings has evolved from roughly 1.24 in September 2024 to a peak of 1.66 in December of that year, and it has since hovered around 1.65. The chart depicting this ratio illustrates a decisive swing toward domestic accumulation, signaling a shift in where Bitcoin is most actively stored and managed. The underlying data are drawn from a prominent data provider that compiles holdings across a spectrum of known US and offshore entities, offering a macro view of how institutional demand concentrates within the United States versus offshore jurisdictions. While the data are comprehensive, they are not exhaustive: the market’s true distribution is more nuanced, given the privacy of some holdings and the dynamic nature of treasury strategies. Nevertheless, the clearly widening gap underscores several interrelated forces shaping the market.

One of the central implications of the rising US dominance is the degree to which regulated pathways—such as spot Bitcoin ETFs and licensed custodial services—are shaping how large holders allocate their Bitcoin. The dominance of US entities suggests that the majority of institutional demand is filtering through pathways that align with U.S. regulatory expectations, disclosure norms, and risk management standards. This, in turn, improves the perceived safety net for large-scale investors who require robust governance, reporting, and counterparty risk controls. From a market operations perspective, concentrated US holdings can influence liquidity distribution, volatility profiles, and the interaction between centralized trading venues and regulated investment products.

The institutional narrative behind this trend is reinforced by several contemporaneous developments in 2024 and early 2025. First, a climate of heightened institutional interest has intersected with a more favorable regulatory and market access environment for Bitcoin exposure in the United States. This includes the rapid expansion of US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs, which provide regulated exposure to Bitcoin for both institutional and retail investors, reducing the friction associated with direct custody and self-management of digital assets. ETFs have become a cornerstone vehicle for institutions seeking regulated, transparent exposure to Bitcoin, with easier onboarding, standardized reporting, and the potential for insurance and custodial protections that align with broader risk-management practices.

Second, the macro price path of Bitcoin—particularly the climb from approximately $60,000 in September 2024 to crossing the $100,000 threshold in January 2025—has reinforced the appeal of Bitcoin as a strategic reserve or risk hedge for institutions. The price breakout has coincided with a shift in reserve allocation, suggesting that as Bitcoin appreciated, the incentive to allocate more reserves under US regulation intensified. Third, the growth of domestic corporate treasury activity, exemplified by high-profile purchases by major players, has contributed to the sense that the United States remains a leading hub for institutional Bitcoin ownership. This has likely fed through to market dynamics, with more market participants seeking regulated access and insights into the behavior of these large holders.

In summarizing the core dynamics at play, several key points emerge. The US-to-offshore reserve ratio offers a lens into where institutions prefer to store and manage Bitcoin, particularly when regulated vehicles offer operational and governance advantages. The upward trajectory from 1.24 to 1.65 over a span of months signals a structural preference for US-based custodianship and investment structures. The price environment plays a supportive role, as the rally above $100,000 has likely attracted additional flows into regulated US products, reinforcing the cycle of domestic accumulation. Yet it is important to recognize that offshore holdings still represent a meaningful portion of the market, and the composition of offshore actors—including certain funds and individual holders—continues to evolve with shifting global macro and regulatory developments.

For investors and market observers, the data imply a more tightly coupled relationship between US financial infrastructure and Bitcoin market dynamics. US-based institutions that rely on regulated custody, audited reporting, and transparent settlement cycles may contribute to greater liquidity resilience in times of stress, even if price volatility remains a constant across the crypto markets. The behavior of these firms—ranging from corporate treasuries to exchange-traded products—can shape demand curves, liquidity depth, and the speed at which price discovery validates new information. In a broader sense, the trend reflects the ongoing integration of Bitcoin into mainstream financial infrastructure, with the United States serving as a central node for infrastructure-driven adoption.

Key considerations and takeaways:

The US-to-offshore reserve ratio has climbed to its strongest level on record, indicating a pronounced domestic bias in Bitcoin holdings among known institutions.
The trend aligns with the expansion of US-listed spot ETFs and regulated pathways that facilitate institutional exposure to Bitcoin.
The price regime—rising above $100,000 and reaching $108,135 at peak—appears to have complemented reserve accumulation, suggesting a feedback loop between price momentum and regulated demand channels.
MicroStrategy and other high-profile corporate buyers are emblematic of the growing corporate treasury appetite for Bitcoin within the United States, reinforcing the narrative of Bitcoin as a treasury asset in a risk-managed portfolio.

In-depth examination of the drivers behind the shift reveals a combination of policy infrastructure, product availability, and corporate strategy. On the policy and regulatory side, the emergence and expansion of regulated venues—particularly spot ETFs listed on US exchanges—provide definable risk controls, clear valuation methodologies, and standardized disclosure. These attributes are precisely the features that risk-conscious institutions seek when allocating trillions of dollars across diversified portfolios. On the product side, the availability of regulated custody and efficient settlement mechanisms reduces the operational burden historically associated with Bitcoin ownership for large entities, further encouraging domestic allocation. From a corporate strategy perspective, the decision by companies to acquire Bitcoin with treasury funds signals a belief that Bitcoin offers asymmetric upside potential as a non-correlated asset class within diversified portfolios.

Finally, while the data show a clear and meaningful trend toward US-dominated reserves, the market’s complexity warrants cautious interpretation. The methods used to categorize “known US entities” and “known offshore entities” may evolve, and new entrants can alter the composition of both sides of the ledger. The influence of undisclosed holdings or entities that operate across borders but are domiciled in the United States could further evolve the observed ratio over time. Nevertheless, the current trajectory points to a robust and ongoing shift in how institutions allocate Bitcoin, with a strong preference for regulated, US-based pathways that support governance, transparency, and scalable access.

MicroStrategy’s decisive accumulation and its market implications

Among the institutions expanding their Bitcoin hoard in a material way, MicroStrategy has consistently stood out as a leading corporate holder of Bitcoin, its treasury strategy becoming a focal point for market observers and industry analysts alike. The latest developments underscore a new tranche of purchases that demonstrate the company’s ongoing commitment to Bitcoin as a strategic asset rather than a mere speculative or contingent investment.

In the closing days of December 2024, MicroStrategy disclosed a purchase of 1,070 BTC, completed between December 30 and December 31, at an average price of roughly $94,004 per Bitcoin. When combined with prior acquisitions, this latest tranche elevated MicroStrategy’s total Bitcoin holdings to 447,470 BTC. Placed at current valuations, the stake equates to approximately $28 billion, representing about 2.1% of the entire supply of Bitcoin that will ever exist. This is not just a numerical milestone; it is a signal about corporate appetite for Bitcoin in a climate of rising institutional interest and increasing acceptance of Bitcoin as a balance-sheet asset.

The funding mechanism behind this purchase is also consistent with MicroStrategy’s established financing approach. The company has repeatedly leaned on capital sourced from convertible note sales to fund its Bitcoin purchases. By converting debt into equity at predefined terms, MicroStrategy can deploy capital to acquire more Bitcoin without immediately diluting share counts or requiring large cash outlays. This approach reflects a broader trend among several corporate players that leverage convertible debt instruments to gain exposure to Bitcoin while preserving flexibility in their capital structure. The strategic rationale is multifaceted: a belief in Bitcoin’s long-term store-of-value properties, a desire to diversify treasuries against inflation, and a conviction that a hard-asset allocation can complement traditional financial assets in a diversified portfolio.

From a market microstructure perspective, MicroStrategy’s accumulation has several implications:

It reinforces the perception that Bitcoin can serve as a strategic reserve for major US corporations, potentially influencing other treasuries to consider similar allocations.
It adds to the liquidity profile of the asset, given the sizable size of MicroStrategy’s holdings and ongoing purchasing behavior, which can influence price discovery in periods of volatility.
It highlights the role of corporate balance-sheet strategies in shaping demand curves and investor sentiment, particularly when a flagship company signals steady, long-horizon conviction.

The impact on the broader market is nuanced. While one company’s purchases may not by themselves move the price, the visibility and consistency of such actions contribute to a narrative that Bitcoin is increasingly integrated into institutional portfolios. This narrative can attract new investors who are seeking regulated exposure or who are evaluating the potential upside of Bitcoin against traditional asset classes. The combination of MicroStrategy’s actions with the expansion of regulated access avenues—such as US-listed ETFs—creates a reinforcing loop: more institutions see a viable regulated path to Bitcoin ownership, leading to more demand and potential price resilience.

The MicroStrategy case also matters for risk management considerations within institutional portfolios. For instance, treasury teams may view Bitcoin as a non-correlated asset that can help dampen portfolio volatility during macroeconomic shifts. However, they will also scrutinize the volatility and liquidity characteristics of Bitcoin, the governance framework of custody providers, and the potential for regulatory changes that could affect access to regulated markets. As such, MicroStrategy’s continued activity may encourage a broader ecosystem of service providers—custodians, auditors, and insurance providers—to tailor offerings for large-scale corporate holdings, further cementing the infrastructure that makes regulated Bitcoin ownership more palatable for ambitious treasuries.

In summary, MicroStrategy’s purchase embodies a broader and growing trend in which US-based institutions, including corporate treasuries, are embracing Bitcoin as a strategic asset within a framework of convertible financing and regulated access. The company’s ongoing accumulation acts as a beacon for others, illustrating both the practical financing techniques involved and the long-term conviction behind such treasury strategies. The cumulative effect is to push Bitcoin into a more mature phase of institutional adoption in the United States, where governance, transparency, and access to regulated vehicles become central pillars of investment theses and risk-management practices.

US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs: regulated access, flows, and market impact

The landscape for Bitcoin exposure in the United States has been markedly shaped by the emergence and growth of US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). These products, launched in January 2024, have become a central conduit through which both institutional and retail investors can gain direct, regulated exposure to Bitcoin price movements without the complexities of direct custody. The inflows into these ETFs have been substantial, with aggregate inflows reaching a notable milestone of about $106.8 billion to date. This level of capital inflow underscores the demand side of regulated Bitcoin access and highlights the degree to which ETFs have become a mainstream instrument in the portfolio allocation of many investors.

From a product design perspective, spot Bitcoin ETFs deliver several advantages that resonate with institutional participants:

Regulated custody and settlement: ETFs operate within established financial market infrastructures, offering clear custody arrangements, independent auditing, and standardized settlement processes.
Transparency and reporting: ETF providers publish holdings, valuation methods, and performance metrics, aligning with the governance standards that institutions rely on for risk assessment and regulatory compliance.
Liquidity and market access: ETFs facilitate liquidity through well-known exchange venues, enabling intraday trading, margin access, and flexible redemption mechanisms that can accommodate large-scale allocations.

The inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs reflect a broader trend toward regulated pathways for owning Bitcoin, contrasted with direct custody by individual institutions or retail investors. This shift has multiple implications for market structure and price dynamics. On the one hand, ETFs can streamline liquidity by aggregating demand across a broad investor base and channeling it into a single, transparent conduit. On the other hand, the presence of large-scale ETF inflows can interact with the underlying spot market, potentially amplifying price sensitivity to ETF-related trading and rebalancing activities. The regulatory framework surrounding ETFs also provides a degree of price discovery discipline that some investors find appealing in the context of a historically volatile asset.

The 2024-2025 period has been characterized by an accelerating alignment between Bitcoin’s price trajectory and regulated financial products, with ETFs acting as a bridge between the crypto market and traditional investment ecosystems. As the market absorbed record inflows, observers have noted how ETF flows may influence demand consistency, particularly during periods of macro uncertainty or regulatory shifts. For market participants, the ETF infrastructure offers a predictable channel to gain exposure, potentially reducing the friction associated with direct Bitcoin purchases and custody arrangements.

It is also important to recognize the broader implications for liquidity and market participation. ETFs can enable a broader slice of the investor base to participate in Bitcoin without requiring specialized custody arrangements, specialized exchange access, or in-depth technical knowledge about private keys and wallet security. This democratization of access contributes to higher participation rates among institutions that were previously cautious about direct holdings. Yet the liquidity, price dynamics, and potential regulatory changes that influence ETF operations will continue to shape how these products participate in price discovery and market cycles.

If one considers the pipeline of product development and regulatory approvals in the US, the ETF ecosystem is likely to continue evolving, potentially expanding into new risk-control frameworks, insurance arrangements, and integration with other financial products such as retirement accounts or index-based strategies. For BTC investors, ETFs offer a compelling avenue to align Bitcoin exposure with broader institutional mandates, diversify treasury strategies, and pursue risk-adjusted returns within a regulated market structure. The continued inflows into US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs will thus remain a critical barometer of institutional confidence and the perceived safety of regulated access to Bitcoin.

At a broader level, the ETF narrative intersects with the reserve-tracking data discussed earlier. The growth of regulated access appears to be correlated with the domestic strengthening of Bitcoin holdings in the United States. While causality cannot be asserted with absolute certainty from observational data alone, the alignment of robust ETF inflows with the rise in US-held reserves suggests that regulated channels are a major driver of the domestic accumulation trend. As the market moves forward, analysts will watch how ETF flows interact with corporate treasury activity, traditional fund flows, and offshore movements—seeking to understand where Bitcoin reserves will concentrate next and how price action might respond to evolving demand dynamics across both regulated and unregulated segments.

Bitcoin price action amid a market correction: on-chain signals, trader behavior, and macro drivers

Following a strong rally that propelled Bitcoin beyond the $100,000 level, the market began to confront a price correction that has reshaped on-chain metrics, liquidity dynamics, and trader sentiment. After breaching the milestone, Bitcoin retraced to around $93,000, a move many analysts consider a natural consolidation following a rapid ascent. The correction has been characterized by a narrowing of unrealized profit margins on the on-chain analytics front, which some market participants interpret as a sign of a cooling market that has absorbed a substantial portion of speculative exuberance from the prior leg higher.

Market participants have highlighted several notable features of the recent price action:

On-chain unrealized profit margins have declined, reflecting reduced immediate profit potential for traders who entered during the recent rally. Some analysts have framed this as a healthy correction after a rally that pushed prices above $100,000, arguing that the market is digesting gains and rebalancing risk exposure rather than signaling an imminent breakdown.
A significant wave of liquidations swept through the crypto market in a 24-hour window, totaling around $521 million, with about $345 million of that amount stemming from long positions. The pullback to a couple of key price nodes, including a dip toward $92,500, was driven by worries about the Federal Reserve’s potential monetary-policy tightening path for 2025. This underscores the intricate link between macro policy expectations and crypto market dynamics, where interest-rate trajectories and liquidity conditions can rapidly alter risk appetite.
Market commentary from on-chain researchers and analysts highlighted how macro indicators—particularly the job market and wage dynamics—can affect risk-on sentiment across asset classes, including crypto. In one assessment, market participants cited a hotter-than-expected non-farm payroll context and related labor market indicators as a catalyst for risk-off behavior, prompting investors to reposition away from risk assets like Bitcoin amid concerns about higher yields and tighter financial conditions.
Price commentary from analysts framed the scenario within a broader technical context. When Bitcoin dipped toward the $95,000 support zone, traders and researchers pointed to a combination of improving macro data, regulatory expectations, and the Peso of risk-off sentiment as key drivers of the sell-off and subsequent price stabilization. Technical levels around $95,000 to $90,000 were identified as important support zones, suggesting that a test of the lower region could serve as a barometer for the market’s resilience or vulnerability.

From a risk-management viewpoint, the correction invites a rebalancing of expectations about the near-term trajectory. While the bullish narrative remains intact for many long-term investors who view Bitcoin as a long-duration hedge against inflation and a store of value, the short-to-medium term path hinges on macro conditions, regulatory clarity, and the pace of adoption of regulated investment infrastructure. The correction also provides a testing ground for liquidity strategies, risk controls, and hedging approaches employed by institutions and high-net-worth individuals that rely on dynamic risk budgeting to navigate volatility.

Analysts’ viewpoints converge on a nuanced assessment: the correction is not inherently a reversal of the longer-term trend but a necessary adjustment after an extended rally that has drawn a large number of new entrants and boosted leverage in some market segments. Market observers emphasize that patience and disciplined risk management will be crucial as the market seeks a new equilibrium. As always, a blend of on-chain data, macro indicators, and price action will guide interpretations of whether the market is forming a sustainable base or entering a renewed expansion phase later in the year.

Key on-chain and market indicators to monitor:

Unrealized profit margins across the network and on-chain wallets for signs of shifting profit-taking behavior among major holders.
Liquidations and intraday volatility as a gauge of leverage levels and risk appetite.
The trajectory of Fed policy expectations and their impact on yields, risk assets, and Bitcoin’s correlation with traditional markets.
The evolution of regulated access channels, including ETF and custody offerings, and their influence on liquidity and price responses.
The stance of major institutional holders and corporate treasuries in continuing to acquire Bitcoin or to pause activity amid volatility.

Macro-driven dynamics continue to shape Bitcoin’s price path, but the narrative that Bitcoin is increasingly integrated into regulated financial ecosystems persists. The interplay between price momentum, on-chain signals, macro factors, and institutional participation will dictate whether the market stabilizes at elevated levels or enters a new leg higher in the coming months. Investors should remain mindful that the pace and direction of policy developments, macro data, and liquidity conditions can quickly alter the risk-reward calculus for Bitcoin exposure, particularly for those relying on regulated access channels and institutional-grade custodial solutions.

Market momentum, policy signals, and forward-looking perspectives

The convergence of US-based reserve growth, corporate treasury activity, and regulated exposure channels has created a distinctive market cadence for Bitcoin in the early months of 2025. The macro environment—in particular, the policy outlook from major central banks and the labor market’s performance—continues to exert outsized influence on risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. As the market navigates the implications of higher-for-longer rate expectations, investors and institutions are recalibrating portfolios to balance growth potential with risk control, leveraging the security and transparency that regulated pathways offer to manage Bitcoin exposure.

From a policy perspective, the 2025 environment is likely to feature ongoing considerations around monetary tightening, inflation dynamics, and financial stability. The reactions of policymakers to evolving macro data—such as employment figures, wage growth, and consumer spending—will shape expectations for interest-rate trajectories and the availability of liquidity in financial markets. In this context, Bitcoin’s role as a non-correlated or lightly correlated asset class remains a focal point for risk-managed portfolios, particularly for those seeking hedges against inflation or diversification benefits within a broader asset allocation.

On the demand side, the combination of corporate treasury strategies, increasing ETF-related flows, and the broader expansion of regulated access instruments can sustain elevated levels of demand for Bitcoin in the US market. As institutions gain greater comfort with regulated custody, auditing, and insurance arrangements, the appetite to hold Bitcoin as a strategic asset may solidify further, potentially supporting continued reserve growth and price resilience. On the supply side, while the total supply of Bitcoin is capped, new entrants into regulated ecosystems may add depth to liquidity and enhance market efficiency, particularly during periods of stress or volatility.

Looking ahead, several scenarios could shape the next phase of Bitcoin’s journey in the United States and beyond:

A sustained uptrend supported by continued institutional inflows, especially through regulated vehicles, which could push the price to higher sustenance levels as demand concentrates in compliant channels.
A plateau or modest correction in price that aligns with macro cooling signals, allowing on-chain metrics to stabilize and for reserve accumulation to transition into a steady, long-run growth trajectory.
Regulatory clarity or policy shifts that unlock additional regulated products or custody enhancements, expanding the universe of onshore paths for institutional investors to participate in Bitcoin exposure.
Global developments that affect offshore holdings or drive institutional funds to diversify exposure across jurisdictions, potentially altering the balance between US-based and offshore reserves.

Investors should maintain a holistic view that captures on-chain indicators, market sentiment, macro data, and policy developments. The best-informed decisions will likely emerge from synthesizing these dimensions rather than relying on a single data source or metric. As the market continues to evolve, the interplay between institutional adoption, regulated access, and macro-driven risk appetite will continue to define Bitcoin’s price trajectory and market resilience.

Conclusion
The current landscape shows a clear tilt of Bitcoin reserves toward US-based institutions, with the ratio of US to offshore holdings reaching record highs and the gap widening in the face of rising institutional demand and regulated market access. Major corporate buyers, notably MicroStrategy, have reinforced the perception that Bitcoin can function as a strategic asset within diversified, risk-managed portfolios, leveraging convertible financing to fuel deliberate accumulation. The expansion of US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs has further institutionalized access to Bitcoin, reinforcing the domestic reserve trend and providing a regulated channel for large-scale investment. In parallel, Bitcoin’s price action—surging past $100,000, peaking at over $108,000, and then undergoing a correction—has implicated on-chain metrics and macro policy expectations in short-term market dynamics, including significant long and short liquidations and shifts in risk sentiment.

The synthesis of these developments points to a crypto market that is maturing in its intersection with traditional finance: the consolidation of regulated investment channels, the visibility of institutional- and corporate-scale demand, and a price environment that attracts attention from both mainstream investors and niche market participants. While the path forward will be influenced by macro policy, labor-market resilience, and evolving regulatory frameworks, the core trajectory suggests sustained interest from US-based institutions, a continued role for ETFs and other regulated products in facilitating exposure, and ongoing attention to how reserve distributions between US and offshore entities evolve over time. As market participants navigate this complex landscape, the emphasis remains on disciplined risk management, diversified exposure through regulated avenues, and a keen eye on regulatory signals that could redefine how Bitcoin is integrated into standard investment portfolios.